Proposition 8 can go to voters

By Karen Gullo and David Watts Barton, Bloomberg, August 8, 2008

A ballot measure to ban gay marriage in California can go to voters in November, a judge ruled, over
the objection of an advocacy group that said state Attorney General Jerry Brown improperly changed its wording.
A group opposed to same-sex marriage sued the state claiming Brown’s changes to the measure’s title and summary — the first words voters see on their ballots — could sway Californians to vote against it.
State court Judge Timothy Frawley in Sacramento ruled today that the language isn’t “false, misleading, argumentative, or likely to create prejudice.”
The judge found that the ballot measure summary “is an accurate statement of what this proposition does,” said Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, which supported
Brown’s wording change. “It eliminates the right of same sex couples to marry. It’s a shame that the other side is trying to confuse voters.”
California became the second state behind Massachusetts to legalize gay marriage when the state Supreme Court in May struck down laws banning the nuptials. The ballot measure, called Proposition 8, would amend the California constitution to say marriage is only between a man and a woman, voiding the court’s ruling.
The ballot’s title and summary originally said Proposition 8 “amends the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid, or recognized in
Brown re-wrote the wording to read that Proposition 8 “changes the California constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry.” The old wording was written before the California Supreme Court legalized gay marriage, so the changes were appropriate, Brown said.
The group Protect Marriage, proponents of the ballot measure, said it will appeal today’s ruling.
“The language in the Ballot Title & Summary for Proposition 8 is argumentative and seeks to negatively affect voters,” Andrew Pugno, legal counsel for Proposition 8, said in a statement. “Since the Superior Court would not exercise its authority to protect voters against misleading language, we will ask the Appellate Court to do so.”
The case is Jansson v. Bowen, Superior Court of California (Sacramento County).

Comments Off on Proposition 8 can go to voters


Comments Off on Proposition 8 can go to voters


Aug 29, 2020

I have been so absorbed in life and work that I’ve been completely slack when it comes to all my online life:, social media, and yes, this blog. I’m going through the manuscript for Japan from Anime to Zen, and even that has been slowed by my life and homemaking work. I’ve been getting […]


Aug 14, 2020

I’ve been consumed with a current project and have been remiss in updating, but I’m starting playing catch up today! Here’s Week 31, two weeks behind, but we’ll get there! Now, back to work. Weeks 32 and 33 will appear soon, I promise!! Meanwhile, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards go free! A new Stones […]


Jul 29, 2020

I arrived Thursday night in Brooklyn, and nearly a week in, I already feel like a changed man. It’s not New York of course,  it’s the people I know, and the new people I’ve met, and old friends I’ve connected with. And some very interesting experiences. New York is a vortex, and it sucks me […]

recent blog posts

read more about david

Thank you for checking out my blog - it’s just the tip of the iceberg.  I am working on projects regarding music history, Japanese culture and my songwriting.

- A week-by-week music history website,
- An upcoming book on Japanese culture, Japan from Anime to Zen
- A YouTube channel, featuring random songs and thoughts for the pandemic
- Original music on Spotify, with links to Patreon and Amazon 

David Watts Barton

Submit Form

Wherever I am in the world, I am reachable by email. Please just fill the form below and I’ll get back to you pronto!

Thank you for getting in touch.
We will reply to you within 24 hours.

Contact DAVID